Forum Index > Trail Talk > Drought emergency declared for most of WA
 Reply to topic
Previous :: Next Topic
Author Message
Logbear
Member
Member


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 539 | TRs | Pics
Location: Getchell. Wash
Logbear
Member
PostSat Apr 27, 2024 4:37 pm 
https://waterdata.usgs.gov/monitoring-location/12500450/#parameterCode=00065&period=P30D&showMedian=false Yakima River If a drought begins when the 75th percentile is reached, then the drought for this area started Apr 17 at 10PM. Now that the level went above the 75th percentile (Apr 26th 7:45 PM) is the drought for this area over?

“There is no such thing as bad weather, only inappropriate clothing.” – Sir Ranulph Fiennes
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
RumiDude
Marmota olympus



Joined: 26 Jul 2009
Posts: 3600 | TRs | Pics
Location: Port Angeles
RumiDude
Marmota olympus
PostSat Apr 27, 2024 5:56 pm 
I don't know exactly what all the angst is about. It is pretty straight forward about the who what where why how. It turns out this is mainly for the agricultural economy and water supply systems. Rumi

"This is my Indian summer ... I'm far more dangerous now, because I don't care at all."

ChinookPass, Gil
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Logbear
Member
Member


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 539 | TRs | Pics
Location: Getchell. Wash
Logbear
Member
PostSat Apr 27, 2024 6:20 pm 
I'm seriously asking because I don't know. I don't have any angst. If a drought is declared when water supply goes less than 75%, does the drought end when it goes above 75%. I'm not asking this to argue. I really don't know. I looked at a few river flows today and they were all going up.

“There is no such thing as bad weather, only inappropriate clothing.” – Sir Ranulph Fiennes
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
altasnob
Member
Member


Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 1437 | TRs | Pics
Location: Tacoma
altasnob
Member
PostSat Apr 27, 2024 6:58 pm 
Logbear wrote:
If a drought is declared when water supply goes less than 75%, does the drought end when it goes above 75%.
Once a drought emergency is declared, they don't undo it even if we are hit with a biblical rainstorm and there is flooding in the streets. The drought emergency declaration triggers the state moving money from the general fund to Ecology, who then dolls the money out to grant recipients. Once the money starts to flow, you can't turn it off. Also, it's not as simple as just looking at stream flows and saying below 75% drought, above no drought. You have to factor in the available water in the entire watershed, and the available water in the future as well (not just what is in the stream at a given moment).

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Tom
Admin



Joined: 15 Dec 2001
Posts: 17864 | TRs | Pics
Tom
Admin
PostSat Apr 27, 2024 7:25 pm 
https://apps.ecology.wa.gov/publications/UIPages/documents/2411013.pdf
Quote:
Ecology is making up to $4.5 million available under this funding opportunity to reduce hardship from current drought conditions. As the drought unfolds, Ecology will continue to evaluate the need for funding and adjust as able.
Perhaps the initial 4.5 million might be irreversible, but I'd think that's a far cry from "Once the money starts to flow, you can't turn it off."

RumiDude
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Logbear
Member
Member


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 539 | TRs | Pics
Location: Getchell. Wash
Logbear
Member
PostSun Apr 28, 2024 12:08 am 
altasnob wrote:
Logbear wrote:
If a drought is declared when water supply goes less than 75%, does the drought end when it goes above 75%.
Once a drought emergency is declared, they don't undo it even if we are hit with a biblical rainstorm and there is flooding in the streets. The drought emergency declaration triggers the state moving money from the general fund to Ecology, who then dolls the money out to gr. Save money ant recipients. Once the money starts to flow, you can't turn it off. Also, it's not as simple as just looking at stream flows and saying below 75% drought, above no drought. You have to factor in the available water in the entire watershed, and the available water in the future as well (not just what is in the stream at a given moment).
Thanks for the simple answer. I think I get it now. The declaration triggers money movement when all the numbers (snowpack, lake levels, river flows, etc) hits the trigger. It doesn't say, or care, if we're still in a drought or not. I'm glad a drought has been declared because I like using money to conserve water. And it's not just water that gets saved. When drip irrigation goes in, electric power cost for pumping goes way down. Save water. Save money I would imagine that this money movement upon declaration of a drought will come up every year.

“There is no such thing as bad weather, only inappropriate clothing.” – Sir Ranulph Fiennes
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
gb
Member
Member


Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 6316 | TRs | Pics
gb
Member
PostSun Apr 28, 2024 6:11 am 
peter707 wrote:
This needs a bit more specification, which of these is intended? "For all 5 locations, the temperature will be above normal and the precipitation will be below normal?" "For a majority of the 5 locations, the temperature will be above normal and the precipitation will be below normal?" "For one of 5 locations, the temperature will be above normal and the precipitation will be below normal?" "For all 5 locations, either the temperature will be above normal or the precipitation will be below normal?" "For a majority of the 5 locations, either the temperature will be above normal or the precipitation will be below normal?" "For one of 5 locations, either the temperature will be above normal or the precipitation will be below normal?"
11,000' on Mt. Adams, Summer 2022
11,000' on Mt. Adams, Summer 2022
It won't be a close call. I am just going with the CPC monthly outlook and discussion thereof which cites longer term trends combined with El Nino. By latter summer El Nino is supposed to transition to La Nina. Also the last number of summers (trend) the greatest departure from normal has been in late spring and early summer. Latter summers have been closer to normal.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
gb
Member
Member


Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 6316 | TRs | Pics
gb
Member
PostSun Apr 28, 2024 6:21 am 
Tom wrote:
https://apps.ecology.wa.gov/publications/UIPages/documents/2411013.pdf
Quote:
Ecology is making up to $4.5 million available under this funding opportunity to reduce hardship from current drought conditions. As the drought unfolds, Ecology will continue to evaluate the need for funding and adjust as able.
Perhaps the initial 4.5 million might be irreversible, but I'd think that's a far cry from "Once the money starts to flow, you can't turn it off."
That's the thing. Think of it as an insurance policy that costs about 60 cents per citizen.

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
altasnob
Member
Member


Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 1437 | TRs | Pics
Location: Tacoma
altasnob
Member
PostSun Apr 28, 2024 8:22 am 
Logbear wrote:
I'm glad a drought has been declared because I like using money to conserve water.
People assume money spent on water conservation is always good for the environment. If you look at the Western US, residential users are not the primary users, it is agriculture and livestock. CA and AZ are in a perpetual water crisis not necessarily because of the millions who live there, it's because they grow a ton of crops and livestock that require large amounts of water in places that naturally don't receive much rainfall. Same is true here in WA to some extent. Is continuing to promote inefficient agriculture in inefficient places good for the environment? Is promoting more development in water restricted areas good for the environment? Is paying farmers and ranchers to not farm and ranch an efficient use of resources?

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Logbear
Member
Member


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 539 | TRs | Pics
Location: Getchell. Wash
Logbear
Member
PostSun Apr 28, 2024 9:49 am 
gb wrote:
peter707 wrote:
This needs a bit more specification, which of these is intended? "For all 5 locations, the temperature will be above normal and the precipitation will be below normal?" "For a majority of the 5 locations, the temperature will be above normal and the precipitation will be below normal?" "For one of 5 locations, the temperature will be above normal and the precipitation will be below normal?" "For all 5 locations, either the temperature will be above normal or the precipitation will be below normal?" "For a majority of the 5 locations, either the temperature will be above normal or the precipitation will be below normal?" "For one of 5 locations, either the temperature will be above normal or the precipitation will be below normal?"
11,000' on Mt. Adams, Summer 2022
11,000' on Mt. Adams, Summer 2022
It won't be a close call. I am just going with the CPC monthly outlook and discussion thereof which sites longer term trends combined with El Nino. By latter summer El Nino is supposed to transition to La Nina. Also the last number of summers (trend) the greatest departure from normal has been in late spring and early summer. Latter summers have been closer to normal.
El Nino is Rapidly Collapsing And the effects of El Nino, including a wet California and warm Northwest, should be fading. https://cliffmass.blogspot.com/

“There is no such thing as bad weather, only inappropriate clothing.” – Sir Ranulph Fiennes
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
RumiDude
Marmota olympus



Joined: 26 Jul 2009
Posts: 3600 | TRs | Pics
Location: Port Angeles
RumiDude
Marmota olympus
PostSun Apr 28, 2024 1:17 pm 
Logbear wrote:
El Nino is Rapidly Collapsing And the effects of El Nino, including a wet California and warm Northwest, should be fading. https://cliffmass.blogspot.com/
Wow! Who would have guessed that when the weather forecast aligns with Cliff Mass's preferred narrative, he suddenly sounds much more certain about long range weather predictions. No "snake oil" in his concluding statement: "My suggestion: if you can make some good deals on ski equipment, do so...." Funny how that changes when it's his prediction. My personal note is that Cliff Mass is a really good meteorologist. But he is also a highly opinionated editorialist who is quite often wrongheaded and just plain wrong. There's nothing wrong with that as long as he keeps those two clearly separated. When he doesn't, he loses a lot of credibility. YMMV Rumi

"This is my Indian summer ... I'm far more dangerous now, because I don't care at all."
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
jinx'sboy
Member
Member


Joined: 30 Jul 2008
Posts: 937 | TRs | Pics
Location: on a great circle route
jinx'sboy
Member
PostWed May 01, 2024 8:20 pm 
Monthly Wildfire predictive update out today - 5/1 - from National Interagency Fire Center. These are a pretty well thought out compilation from weather and fire behavior specialists at regional and national levels. About 8 minutes long. Begins with a rundown of current and winter moisture conditions. Updates of the predictions for May, June, July and August start 1/2 through, with maps. Interestingly, NW Washington is forecast to be ‘above normal’ for fire potential, but not the rest of the State. https://www.nifc.gov/nicc-files/predictive/NMAC_Weather_Outlook.mp4

Anne Elk, runup
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Eric Hansen
Member
Member


Joined: 23 Mar 2015
Posts: 880 | TRs | Pics
Location: Wisconsin
Eric Hansen
Member
PostWed May 01, 2024 8:47 pm 
Yep, I check that first of the month update, print version online. Here in Wisconsin we just now got off the "red zone" above normal outlook for wildfire but they are predicting us back in the red come June. Drop down a tad there and you will see the "North American" summary and outlook, for the whole continent. Benefit there is viewing maps of Canadian conditions and outlook.

Off trail rambler

jinx'sboy
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Eric Hansen
Member
Member


Joined: 23 Mar 2015
Posts: 880 | TRs | Pics
Location: Wisconsin
Eric Hansen
Member
PostFri May 03, 2024 6:50 pm 
Two slightly different Canadian "fire weather" maps. "Updated daily" https://cwfis.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/maps/fw https://cwfis.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/maps/fw?type=fwi

Off trail rambler
Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
Cyclopath
Faster than light



Joined: 20 Mar 2012
Posts: 7786 | TRs | Pics
Location: Seattle
Cyclopath
Faster than light
PostSat May 04, 2024 9:50 am 
Drought busting rains, huh?

Back to top Reply to topic Reply with quote Send private message
   All times are GMT - 8 Hours
 Reply to topic
Forum Index > Trail Talk > Drought emergency declared for most of WA
  Happy Birthday Rich Baldwin, O'Brannigan, trail wiseguy!
Jump to:   
Search this topic:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum